Not many people whom I consider “theorists SEO“: true thinkers who make the first line of research, formulate their thoughts and share their findings. A number of spammers practice the method of SEO (Experiment. Evaluate. Set.) But they are professionals in the applied sciences SEO development theorists. Many spammers hang tight and share ideas without being very methodical.
Among the theorists who have some real content-is-king creedists and almost everyone is an apologist for link. Neither group pays close attention to what the other group says. Spammers are more influenced by apologists for the link, which also affect much of the SEO community in general. Apologetics link posted on the Web every day. Apologists link field rule.
I consider myself a generalist. I can create links as needed. I can assess the links when needed. But he also devoted much time and energy to study the dynamics of the theory of content. Search engines must check the documents of relevance. Now, I could study Recovery Information Sciences and understand the basic principles of qualification documents, but that does not tell me much about why a particular document is very well positioned in search results.
Like it or not search engines use two ingredients to make their results: links and content. If you want to succeed in manipulating the search engine results you need links and content. It is not necessary to understand the algorithms to use the theoretical tools that have been through the years. In fact, most of the SEO leaders today do not really understand the algorithms – but they are the leaders, because they use the tools and ideas we have inherited successfully.
Actually there is almost nothing you need to know about the links: Some links to pass value and some links. The more links to pass the value you get, the more you can manipulate the search results. Most people stop there and act as if they had discovered the Unified Field Theory.
If you want to understand the dynamics of the links that you can look at the old link, link placement, anchor text links, data link, links not only influence the search results. They also influence people.
But the content is a much more complex than the links. Most apologists link just do not understand the value of content. You can usually separate the apologists for the apologists link contained in any group of wondering how many queries are SEO optimized for. Anyone who says they’re going for a small number of queries is almost certainly based on the links. Anyone who tells you to optimize hundreds or thousands of queries is lying or collaborates extensively with the content.
As of this writing today, the objectives of the SEO Theory blog (and ranks in the top 10) over 200 queries. This blog has only existed since December 2006 and moved to its own domain in February 2007. I put less than 20 links to other sites on this blog. I have asked people to link to it. I have not bought any link to it. I have not really made an effort to further promote the blog.
And yet, despite the SEO Theory prominently for more than 200 specific expressions (all of which send traffic to the blog), and although not actively promote the theory of SEO (a lot), 70 % and 80% of all traffic to the theory of SEO comes not to seek the sources. About 51% of those who come here directly, or enter the URL or clicking on links in your Favorites menu in your browser. Most weeks 20 to 25% of our visitors come from search engines (Google in particular).
I use internal linking to reinforce the importance of certain keywords. But making liberal use of standard tools available for each Web editor to build relevance for targeted expressions: repetition, bold, italic, Hx titles, page titles and the URL of the page.
Using only the principles that I write in this blog I created a loyal audience of about 800-1000 readers (some of whom only visit once or twice a month, but usually spend 15-30 minutes to catch up with the various posts). More than 1,000 unique visitors each month to come, many of them come by often. And here lies the secret of my success slow and persevering that I found. I’ve found.
You came when I called. Have you found anything I wanted to read, but I had to figure out what I wanted to read and put it here, where she encounters.
Some of you come through the links pointing to this site from other sites. Some of you come through the SERPs. Many of you come from the embedded links in your email (you can attest that do not send). I do not know why you’re here. I only know that they are attracted by the content of me, because it meets a felt need.
That’s marketing on the Internet, but considering that hundreds of queries to attract visitors from search engines every month, I think it’s fair to say that SEO Theory does a good job of optimizing for the search.
I use three sources to determine what I write and how to optimize for this: First, I draw on my own personal experience. Secondly, I look at popular topics and study SEO consultations are a source of inspiration. Third, look at the statistics this homing domain registrations.
SEO My personal experience goes back more than 9 years. I have been optimizing websites since the summer of 1998 when I realized I was not getting traffic from search engines and online newsletter I subscribed to the Promotion. I have learned more than I needed to know in that first year to interact with the professional marketing community website. I’ve never stopped learning since. I still occasionally do without web site reviews and assessments to help others but also to help me learn about what is happening on the Web today.
Popular topics I SEO forums and blogs. I visit several forums and blogs that link me with the theory of SEO. Most of them are not very interesting, in my opinion, because they deal with things as long as blogs SEO forums have always been concerned. Many of them are now social media forums and blogs, and very rarely have a far more about search engine optimization. And most of the content search engine optimization is about the links, especially links from social media. And that’s not very interesting to me.
Still, from time to time see a trend in some SEO issues and I will write about this trend. I have covered trends such as optimization of the query page, the theory of regression, and analysis web spam (to name a few). People are always interested in the Web spam either because it hinders their search results or believe that fraudulent site creators are making more money than any other person (if that were true, would be pushing for thousands MEA). Some Web spammers make a lot of money. Most, if their own income in various dark corners of the Web, do not.
Finally, you tell me what you’re looking for and finding it next to the theory of SEO. Many of the query results more interesting not to include this position in the top 20 listings. Some of you see several pages deep into search results to find my messages. If I am particularly funny or intrigued by a query that I’ll write something about that phrase and optimize for it. In doing so I found some gems that produce steady traffic.
Everyone last year was talking about “optimizing the long tail of search”. However, the euphoria seems to have died down now – as it always does (because this issue has been very popular before). Now we’re back to reading news blogs and blogs “SEO” that focus on Web 2.0, Web 3-D (which I prefer to call Web ThirdGen) and social media links. And most of the news about social media links it seems that social media sites do not want to use SEO to create links.
Gee. Where have I heard that complaint before?
Every time I see someone complain Forum SEO by their inability to sort and remove traffic from search engines, I am tempted to ask: “How many copies are created today?” How many new pages of content – real content many words that someone has to spend time to read – I write today? All you need is a blog. A lot of SEO ignore that advice, but if you look at their blogs, basically all you do is link to other blogs. Sorry, but this relationship will not be enough value for me.
In 1998 I was rejecting 2 out of 3 presentations site for my Xena: Warrior Princess directory because new sites usually only took a logo for the television program and linked to the above list of motors 50-10 search. Yawn. Finally I put an ad on the cover of dircetory is saying, “Hey, if you want to be included in this directory, write something!”
You will never find time blogroll here on SEO Theory because most people do not actually write anything in their blogs. Only publish lists of links. They are not optimized. You can practice what they preach (link), but are stuck in the “I need my friends’ links” area. When I look at the backlinks for SEO Theory, most of them seem to come from the blogs and people who have never heard of before. I do not tell my friends SEO to link each of my post and tell their jaded, bleary-eyed readers that “Michael Martinez has done it again! Go and check out the SEO theory because it has the largest list of links to other blogs today! “
If all I can think of is slapping a list of links flights for your blog readers hard-won, then maybe it’s time for you to turn your blog. We do not need no stinking links.
If someone takes the time to write a query in a search engine, they are looking for real content. If you click one of the messages from your blog and then is not really your concern, what do you say that? He says they can not find what you want and are waiting to give it to them. What if you come in a day or two weekends? The major search engines tell us that approximately 20-30% of their consultations had not been seen before. The chances that someone else will use the query you just are optimized for it. And if you hit the top five listings see that the odds are better than query provides constant traffic for you.
Rank 1st in 1000 queries that produce a visitor per day is preferable to the fight for first place in one or two queries that produce 200 to 300 visitors a day. If you can meet the needs of 1,000 per day, you’re doing great, right?
The user clicks on the average of 1.8 pages per visit here on SEO Theory. What does that tell you? It tells you that after reading that landed on any page, click the newcomers through the main direction of the blog to see what else I have written.
The average spending of visitors began about 1.5 minutes per visit to the Theory of SEO in December. Now they spend about 3 minutes per visit. What does that tell you? He says that people stay around to reading the site. It tells you that people like what they find here.
Now maybe I’m a little more polished in babbling thoughts of some people. Luckily I have occasionally. But there’s only one way to become a good writer or a great writer. You have to write.
If your page than 100,000 e-commerce site is not reaching thousands of references to every day, do not panic. Your blog can and you can write on thousands of items without the name of prices. Put the link to the corresponding page in the inventory section. So I take a little time to build search visibility. That’s no reason not to take in the great task. It is very easy to achieve rankings for about 100 questions of SEO, because I never most people optimize for them. The same is true of your inventory.
You need not be limited to optimizing a query in each position. If I can drive a dozen at a time, you can nail a dozen at a time. If you miss some with each post, do not worry. You have plenty of opportunities to try to Agani.
Optimization of the long tail has always been part of search engine optimization. In the old days I did not know what to call it, but this advice goes back to before the days when everybody started screaming and hollaring on the links. Content is a means towards the end of the accumulation of links. In fact, some people have openly admitted that the traffic of Digg does not have good results. Digg and Web Adsense not share very well.
Promoting your cheap link spammers “by the book” SEO services helped to flood with links Ickipedia Ickicommunity trash and responded by adding “rel =” nofollow “to the most outbound links. Many web forums have been disabled signatures links in the profiles, and other so-called “SEO friendly” features to discourage link drops in their discussions. Parasitic relationship building really only irritates people and has no lasting effect. Once dependent on cheap spam links you to commit to an endless cycle of desperate actions cloying.
With the content, you can write once, write a hundred times and never leaves. If a page consultation all you have to do is link to it. In most cases the pages back from the depth of consultation through some links from the pages of a good brother. You can write a few pages of gold that brought a lot of unexpected traffic. And you build your foundation for link building considerably, if you take more competitive queries.
Remember, SEO works with real content and links and does not treat any ingredient to be more important than the other. You have to have both, but if built the first content, you will find links that come with more ease – especially the links to integrate itself in its own inventory increasing content. Content is king. The links are not kings. Both are subjects of its growing empire of the Web and search visibility.